CodeGPT vs opcode vs Capture.dev vs Continue
Which one fits you in 2026? Traffic, pricing, input → output, tasks and community side by side.
Your tool
CodeGPT
vs
CodeGPT
Competitor 1
opcode
opcode
Competitor 2
Capture.dev
Capture.dev
Competitor 3
Continue
ContinueCompare
4 tools · best value per row highlighted
Competitor
opcode
opcode
opcode.sh
opcode is a free, open-source desktop application that gives Anthropic's command-line coding agent a graphical interface.
Competitor
Continue
Continue
continue.dev
Continue is an open-source AI coding agent that was built by a community of developers and has since been acquired by Cursor.
Traffic estimated monthly website traffic
Monthly visits
188.3Kvisits/mo
—
1.7Kvisits/mo
410.4Kvisits/mo
MoM change
▲ 0.8%
—
▼ 54.5%
▼ 16.6%
6-month growth
-37.2%
—
-15.1%
-24.4%
Global rank web
#251,957
—
#4,223,489
#106,338
Avg. last 3 months
196.6K
—
2.9K
539.2K
Bounce rate lower is better
43%
—
37%
48%
Pages / visit
1.9
—
2.5
2.4
Visit duration
38s
—
1m 07s
1m 44s
Traffic sources
● Direct 58% · ● Referral 42%
—
—
● Direct 93% · ● Referral 6%
CodeGPTopcodeCapture.devContinue
Pricing
Model
Freemium
Free
Free Trial
Free
Starting price
$9per month · free tier available
Free
$29per month
Free
Free tier
–
Free trial
–
–
–
API access
–
–
–
–
Plans
Free FreeProfessional $9/moTeams $27/moEnterprise Custom
Open source Free
Free Trial CustomUnlimited $29/mo
—
Capabilities input → output
Input
CodeText
CodeText
DataImages
CodeText
Output
Code
Code
Text
Code
Skill level
Intermediate
Advanced
Intermediate
Advanced
Categories
Tasks what each tool can do · 0 shared · core partial
Tasks covered
3
2
6
3
Coding
–
Debugging
–
–
MCP
–
–
Bug reports
–
–
–
Code reviews
–
–
–
Bug tracker
–
–
–
Developer tools
–
–
–
Development
–
–
–
Jira issues tracking
–
–
–
Screenshot management
–
–
–
Community on aitoolstime
Rating
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
Upvotes
▲ 0
▲ 0
▲ 0
▲ 0
Saves
0
0
0
0
Reviews
0
0
0
0
Prompts
0
0
0
0
Verified listing
–
–
–
–
Traffic figures are third-party estimates for the tool's own domain; tools sharing a domain with a bigger product are not counted. Pricing is captured from each tool's site and may lag.