⭐ Featured

Claude

AI assistant built to be helpful, harmless, and honest

★★★★★ 4.6 (5 reviews)
1.5K views
Claude screenshot
🔍 Click to enlarge

Teams wanting AI that doesn't compromise on privacy find Claude refreshing. You can connect your Google Workspace without worrying about data misuse. Claude's privacy-first approach means your sensitive documents stay protected while it helps with everything from email drafts to spreadsheet analysis.

Available Models & Versions

Click to expand details

Anthropic's most advanced model with exceptional planning, code review, debugging, and long-horizon task capabilities. First Opus model with adaptive thinking and 128K max output tokens.

Adaptive Thinking Agent Teams 128K Output Context Compaction 1M Context Window ARC AGI 2: 68.8% Terminal-Bench: 65.4% MRCR v2: 76%
💰 $5/$25 per 1M input/output tokens 📅 Released Feb 2026

Reviews (5)

Umut⚡ Pro
5 days ago
★★★★★

Max Plan and do everything

4.5 was good, but 4.6 is much better. I’m on the max plan and honestly it feels like a magical mystery tour, like the Beatles song 8). You more or less tell it what you want, and it gets you there.

I’ve read all reviews btw, and one thing they’re right about is CSS editing. That part can be really frustrating. You ask it to fix one small CSS bug, and somehow it breaks three other things, or changes stuff you didn’t even touch.

Most of the time it’s amazing, but when it comes to layout or tiny visual details, it can turn into this weird back-and-forth of “no, not that, undo that, just move this 5px”. Still, compared to where we were a year ago, this feels kind of insane.

👎 Cons: would honestly expect the CSS editing part to be much better by now
J
15 days ago
★★★☆☆

facts

If you try to edit some CSS, it sometimes goes totally idiot mode and drives me crazy.

And sometimes, even when I don’t ask for that kind of thing, Claude suddenly starts doing something out of the blue and ends up nowhere. This happens especially after the chat goes on for a while.

Honestly, it starts to feel like the main goal is just to make you spend more tokens.

👍 Pros: good at start
👎 Cons: goes total retard after a while
N
16 days ago
★★★★★

By Far Best for Coding

If Claude Opus 4.5 is already operating at this level, -tobehonest it is a bit scary, what's gonna happen in next 3 years? Even clueless person can create an app right now

👍 Pros: works like magic
👎 Cons: 5$ extra usage - should be more less
M
29 days ago
★★★★★

Impressive

Been using Opus 4.5 for like 3 weeks now and honestly? kinda blown away.

Threw it at a legacy React codebase thats been haunting me for months - class components, weird state management, the whole mess. It actually understood what I was trying to do architecturally, not just "here's how to fix this syntax error." Caught edge cases I forgot existed lol

The plan mode thing is legit. It asks questions first, makes a plan.md, then executes. Finally feels like pair programming with someone who bothers reading the ticket before coding.

Not perfect tho. Asked it some graph theory stuff for an optimization problem and got a very "I read the Wikipedia article" type answer. Also the pricing stil hurts if you're iterating alot.

Switched from GPT-5.1 Codex which felt more "enterprise ready" I guess? But Opus writes code that actually looks like a human wrote it. Idk how to explain it but if youve used it you know.

Anyway yeah, best coding model I've tried so far. Not for everthing but for actual dev work its solid.

👍 Pros: code quality, plan mode, actually understands context
👎 Cons: pricing, math/theory stuff, sometimes too cautious
1 month ago
★★★★★

Best AI

In my opinion, this is the best AI tool on the market for writing code right now. I’ve used many others, including ChatGPT, and for pure coding quality, this one is simply better.

That said, there are clear downsides. The token limit is very restrictive, and having to pay $5 for almost every session can add up quickly. If you’re doing serious or long-running work, the cost becomes noticeable.

Still, when it comes to output quality, logic, and how clean and complete the code is, I honestly think it’s the best option available at the moment.

👍 Pros: Output quality
👎 Cons: Costly

Discussions

Start Discussion
View all discussions →

🔗 Similar AI Tools

Discover more tools in this category

★★★★★ 4.6 (5)
Write Review