In my opinion, this is the best AI tool on the market for writing code right now. I’ve used many others, including ChatGPT, and for pure coding quality, this one is simply better.
That said, there are clear downsides. The token limit is very restrictive, and having to pay $5 for almost every session can add up quickly. If you’re doing serious or long-running work, the cost becomes noticeable.
Still, when it comes to output quality, logic, and how clean and complete the code is, I honestly think it’s the best option available at the moment.
Been using Opus 4.5 for like 3 weeks now and honestly? kinda blown away.
Threw it at a legacy React codebase thats been haunting me for months - class components, weird state management, the whole mess. It actually understood what I was trying to do architecturally, not just "here's how to fix this syntax error." Caught edge cases I forgot existed lol
The plan mode thing is legit. It asks questions first, makes a plan.md, then executes. Finally feels like pair programming with someone who bothers reading the ticket before coding.
Not perfect tho. Asked it some graph theory stuff for a…
PROS
code quality, plan mode, actually understands context
CONS
pricing, math/theory stuff, sometimes too cautious
If you try to edit some CSS, it sometimes goes totally idiot mode and drives me crazy.
And sometimes, even when I don’t ask for that kind of thing, Claude suddenly starts doing something out of the blue and ends up nowhere. This happens especially after the chat goes on for a while.
Honestly, it starts to feel like the main goal is just to make you spend more tokens.
I gave Claude and ChatGPT the exact same prompt for a presentation. Claude delivered something much more visually impressive. ChatGPT’s version felt flat and uninspired, almost like a basic Word file instead of a real presentation.
Claude is basically my assistant now. I use it for almost everything, even simple tasks I could probably do myself. the output is consistently great.
its actually pretty decent for quick UI mockups and landing pages. asked it to build a dashboard layout with some charts and the design came out clean. spacing, colors, component structure all looked good. the spreadsheet/presentation features are nice too
but when i tried it for some backend work it got a bit messy. asked it to help refactor an auth system and it kept touching stuff i didnt ask for. like i just wanted the token refresh logic fixed not the entire middleware rewritten lol
also feels more... idk corporate? 5.1 had more personality imo. this one plays it super safe
Beautiful.ai has genuinely good automatic layout adjustment — slides reflow as you type and the template quality is high. For someone who just wants clean-looking slides without much fuss, it delivers.
Where it falls short is the depth of AI assistance once you're inside the editor. You can adjust content within the predefined SmartSlide types, but if you want to ask AI to rewrite a section, swap out imagery based on context, or restructure a slide, you're mostly on your own. The AI layer feels more like a layout constraint system than a true editing assistant.
I've been using Havi (havi…
PROS
Excellent auto-layout system, high-quality templates, slides always look professional without manual spacing work
CONS
AI editing is shallow — can't prompt AI to rewrite or restructure content mid-session, PPTX export locked behind paid plan, limited flexibility outside predefined SmartSlide types
The chat experience is awful, photo uploads are slow and unreliable, and the character generation is way off no matter how clearly you describe what you want. Once I saw how bad it was, I tried to unsubscribe, but there was no proper cancellation option. I deleted my account and still got charged anyway. Complete ripoff.
Claude is the best AI I’ve used, whether open-source or paid. If you can afford $200 a month, you can actually build serious projects with it and get real value out of it—whether that’s for your main job, side projects, or just handling everyday tasks more efficiently.
4.5 was good, but 4.6 is much better. I’m on the max plan and honestly it feels like a magical mystery tour, like the Beatles song 8). You more or less tell it what you want, and it gets you there.
I’ve read all reviews btw, and one thing they’re right about is CSS editing. That part can be really frustrating. You ask it to fix one small CSS bug, and somehow it breaks three other things, or changes stuff you didn’t even touch.
Most of the time it’s amazing, but when it comes to layout or tiny visual details, it can turn into this weird back-and-forth of “no, not that, undo that, just mov…
CONS
would honestly expect the CSS editing part to be much better by now
I use ChatGPT quite often. Most of the time it gives logical answers, and it is helpful especially when I need ideas or want to make my thoughts clearer.
I also used it to help with my New Year’s outfit, and it worked really well for that.
I tried using it for work-related things too, but it’s not good at everything. I was preparing a carpet catalog in Canva and wanted to speed up the process, so I used ChatGPT. In this case, instead of making things easier, it actually made the process more complicated.
If Claude Opus 4.5 is already operating at this level, -tobehonest it is a bit scary, what's gonna happen in next 3 years? Even clueless person can create an app right now
I’m using Claude for my side projects, but I was curious to see where Gemini stands, so I gave it a try on a simple project.
I gave it very clear instructions, but it only completed around 60% of what I asked. Once it got into the more detailed parts of the implementation, it started failing pretty badly.
For simple stuff, it’s okay. But when the project requires following detailed instructions and actually putting all the pieces together, there’s still a lot of room for improvement.
Cookies on aitoolstime. We use necessary cookies for sign-in, theme and security. With your OK we also set first-party cookies to measure visits and tailor sponsored listings and ads to what you browse. No third-party tracking cookies.
Privacy policy
