Cline vs Continue vs Cursor vs Kilo Code
Which one fits you in 2026? Traffic, pricing, input → output, tasks and community side by side.
Your tool
Cline
vs
Cline
Competitor 1
Continue
Continue
Competitor 2
Cursor
Cursor
Competitor 3
Kilo Code
Kilo CodeCompare
4 tools · best value per row highlighted
Competitor
Continue
Continue
continue.dev
Continue is an open-source AI coding agent that was built by a community of developers and has since been acquired by Cursor.
Competitor
Kilo Code
Kilo Code
kilocode.ai
Kilo Code is an open source AI agent Visual Studio (VS) Code extension that focuses on enhancing the efficiency of coding. The tool can generate code, automate tasks, and offer practical suggestions.
Traffic estimated monthly website traffic
Monthly visits
—
410.4Kvisits/mo
4.5Mvisits/mo
1.9Kvisits/mo
MoM change
—
▼ 16.6%
▲ 7.8%
▼ 42.3%
6-month growth
—
-24.4%
-1.8%
-94.4%
Global rank web
—
#106,338
#15,584
#4,668,091
Avg. last 3 months
—
539.2K
4.4M
10.5K
Bounce rate lower is better
0%
48%
57%
34%
Pages / visit
—
2.4
2.4
2.4
Visit duration
—
1m 44s
1m 36s
19s
Traffic sources
—
● Direct 93% · ● Referral 6%
● Referral 80% · ● Mail 13%
—
ClineContinueCursorKilo Code
Pricing
Model
Free
Free
Freemium
Freemium
Starting price
Free
Free
$20per month · free tier available
$20per month · free tier available
Free tier
Free trial
–
–
–
–
API access
–
–
–
–
Plans
Open Source CustomEnterprise Custom
—
Plan $20.0 $20/moEnterprise $0/mo
—
Capabilities input → output
Input
CodeText
CodeText
CodeText
CodeText
Output
Code
Code
Code
Code
Skill level
Advanced
Advanced
Advanced
Advanced
Categories
Tasks what each tool can do · 1 shared · core partial
Tasks covered
3
3
7
2
Coding
Code reviews
–
–
Refactoring
–
–
Development
–
–
Coding in VS Code
–
–
–
Agents
–
–
–
Debugging
–
–
–
Code documentation
–
–
–
Terminal commands management
–
–
–
Community on aitoolstime
Rating
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
Upvotes
▲ 0
▲ 0
▲ 1
▲ 0
Saves
0
0
0
0
Reviews
0
0
0
0
Prompts
0
0
3
0
Verified listing
–
–
–
–
Traffic figures are third-party estimates for the tool's own domain; tools sharing a domain with a bigger product are not counted. Pricing is captured from each tool's site and may lag.