Sourcegraph Cody vs DeepWiki vs Continue vs Augment Code
Which one fits you in 2026? Traffic, pricing, input → output, tasks and community side by side.
Your tool
Sourcegraph Cody
vs
Sourcegraph Cody
Competitor 1
DeepWiki
DeepWiki
Competitor 2
Continue
Continue
Competitor 3
Augment Code
Augment CodeCompare
4 tools · best value per row highlighted
Competitor
Continue
Continue
continue.dev
Continue is an open-source AI coding agent that was built by a community of developers and has since been acquired by Cursor.
Competitor
Augment Code
Augment Code
augmentcode.com
Augment Code is an agentic software development company whose Cosmos platform runs software agents across the development lifecycle.
Traffic estimated monthly website traffic
Monthly visits
185.6Kvisits/mo
957.2Kvisits/mo
410.4Kvisits/mo
—
MoM change
▼ 10.6%
▼ 2.5%
▼ 16.6%
—
6-month growth
-40.6%
-29.9%
-24.4%
—
Global rank web
#204,583
#63,286
#106,338
—
Avg. last 3 months
209.7K
998K
539.2K
—
Bounce rate lower is better
42%
57%
48%
—
Pages / visit
2.9
2.3
2.4
—
Visit duration
1m 39s
2m 42s
1m 44s
—
Traffic sources
● Direct 91% · ● Referral 7%
● Direct 80% · ● Referral 19%
● Direct 93% · ● Referral 6%
—
Sourcegraph CodyDeepWikiContinueAugment Code
Pricing
Model
Freemium
Free
Free
Paid
Starting price
$16,000per month
Free
Free
$20per month
Free tier
–
–
Free trial
–
–
–
API access
–
–
–
–
Plans
Enterprise $16,000/yr
—
—
Standard $20/moBusiness $100/moEnterprise Custom
Capabilities input → output
Input
CodeText
CodeWeb pages
CodeText
CodeText
Output
Code
Text
Code
Code
Skill level
Advanced
Advanced
Advanced
Advanced
Categories
Tasks what each tool can do · 0 shared · core partial
Tasks covered
1
4
3
3
Coding
–
Code reviews
–
–
Agents
–
–
–
Codebase q a
–
–
–
Code documentation
–
–
–
GitHub
–
–
–
Developer tools
–
–
–
Development
–
–
–
Community on aitoolstime
Rating
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
Upvotes
▲ 0
▲ 0
▲ 0
▲ 0
Saves
0
0
0
0
Reviews
0
0
0
0
Prompts
0
0
0
0
Verified listing
–
–
–
–
Traffic figures are third-party estimates for the tool's own domain; tools sharing a domain with a bigger product are not counted. Pricing is captured from each tool's site and may lag.