Paperguide vs Sourcely vs ResearchRabbit vs ScienceOS

Which one fits you in 2026? Traffic, pricing, input → output, tasks and community side by side.

Your tool
Paperguide
vs
Competitor 1
Sourcely
Competitor 2
ResearchRabbit
Competitor 3
ScienceOS
Compare
4 tools · best value per row highlighted
Your tool Paperguide
paperguide.ai
Competitor Sourcely
sourcely.net
Competitor ResearchRabbit
researchrabbit.ai
AI-powered literature mapping
Competitor ScienceOS
scienceos.ai
Researchers waste hours hunting through literature—piecing together fragments from different papers
Traffic estimated monthly website traffic
Monthly visits
262.6Kvisits/mo
121.3Kvisits/mo
907.4Kvisits/mo
64.9Kvisits/mo
MoM change
▲ 4.7%
▼ 17.6%
▼ 17.3%
▼ 6.2%
6-month growth
+44.6%
-27.7%
-22.2%
+1.2%
Global rank web
#182,104
#330,988
#51,921
#464,304
Avg. last 3 months
266.5K
143.2K
992.4K
68.2K
Bounce rate lower is better
44%
39%
43%
39%
Pages / visit
2.3
2.2
3.1
3.7
Visit duration
1m 32s
33s
2m 02s
1m 37s
Traffic sources
● Direct 80% · ● Referral 14%
● Direct 63% · ● Referral 35%
● Direct 91% · ● Referral 8%
● Direct 98% · ● Mail 2%
PaperguideSourcelyResearchRabbitScienceOS
0304.4K608.9K913.3K1.2MPaperguide · 181KPaperguide · 215.1KPaperguide · 183.1KPaperguide · 181.6KPaperguide · 232.2KPaperguide · 282.6KPaperguide · 286.3KPaperguide · 250.7KPaperguide · 262.6KSourcely · 173KSourcely · 157.2KSourcely · 167.7KSourcely · 167.8KSourcely · 202.7KSourcely · 169.2KSourcely · 161.1KSourcely · 147.1KSourcely · 121.3KResearchRabbit · 1.1MResearchRabbit · 908.5KResearchRabbit · 939.4KResearchRabbit · 1MResearchRabbit · 1.2MResearchRabbit · 1.2MResearchRabbit · 1.2MResearchRabbit · 972.1KResearchRabbit · 1.1MResearchRabbit · 907.4KScienceOS · 79.4KScienceOS · 75.1KScienceOS · 79.7KScienceOS · 64.1KScienceOS · 64.5KScienceOS · 56.4KScienceOS · 70.5KScienceOS · 69.2KScienceOS · 64.9K10K100K1M10MPaperguide · 181KPaperguide · 215.1KPaperguide · 183.1KPaperguide · 181.6KPaperguide · 232.2KPaperguide · 282.6KPaperguide · 286.3KPaperguide · 250.7KPaperguide · 262.6KSourcely · 173KSourcely · 157.2KSourcely · 167.7KSourcely · 167.8KSourcely · 202.7KSourcely · 169.2KSourcely · 161.1KSourcely · 147.1KSourcely · 121.3KResearchRabbit · 1.1MResearchRabbit · 908.5KResearchRabbit · 939.4KResearchRabbit · 1MResearchRabbit · 1.2MResearchRabbit · 1.2MResearchRabbit · 1.2MResearchRabbit · 972.1KResearchRabbit · 1.1MResearchRabbit · 907.4KScienceOS · 79.4KScienceOS · 75.1KScienceOS · 79.7KScienceOS · 64.1KScienceOS · 64.5KScienceOS · 56.4KScienceOS · 70.5KScienceOS · 69.2KScienceOS · 64.9KNov '25DecJan '26FebMarAprMayJunJulAug
Pricing
Model
Freemium
Freemium
Freemium
Freemium
Starting price
$12per month · free tier available
$19per month · free tier available
$10per month · free tier available
€7.25per month · free tier available
Free tier
Free trial
–
–
–
API access
–
–
–
–
Plans
Free FreePlus $12/moPro $29/moEnterprise Custom
Free FreeUltra $19/moMax $39/mo
Plan $10/mo
Free FreeAngel €7.25/moTeam €6/moInstitution Custom
Capabilities input → output
Input
DocumentsText
Text
DocumentsText
DocumentsText
Output
DataDocumentsText
Text
Data
DataText
Skill level
Beginner-friendly
Beginner-friendly
Beginner-friendly
Intermediate
Categories
Tasks what each tool can do · 3 shared · core   partial
Tasks covered
10
9
9
8
Research
Research papers
Citations
Academic research
–
Scientific literature exploration
–
Literature reviews
–
Literature analysis
–
–
Scientific q a
–
–
–
Academic citation
–
–
–
Citation formatting
–
–
–
PDF analysis
–
–
–
Research papers analysis
–
–
–
Research papers summaries
–
–
–
Research recommendations
–
–
–
Scientific research navigation
–
–
–
Academic q a
–
–
–
Academic writing
–
–
–
Network diagrams
–
–
–
Research papers drafting
–
–
–
Writing
–
–
–
Community on aitoolstime
Rating
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
Upvotes
▲ 0
▲ 0
▲ 0
▲ 0
Saves
0
0
0
0
Reviews
0
0
0
0
Prompts
0
0
0
0
Verified listing
–
–
–
–

Traffic figures are third-party estimates for the tool's own domain; tools sharing a domain with a bigger product are not counted. Pricing is captured from each tool's site and may lag.