DeepWiki-Open vs Replicate vs Mintlify
Which one fits you in 2026? Traffic, pricing, input → output, tasks and community side by side.
Your tool
DeepWiki-Open
vs
DeepWiki-Open
Competitor 1
Replicate
Replicate
Competitor 2
Mintlify
Mintlify
Competitor 3
Suggested competitors for DeepWiki-Open:
DeepWiki84%
Bito AI82%
Supadev81%
ReadMe81%
Code Wiki81%
Swimm81%
RepoRift81%
AIGNE DocSmith81%
DeepWiki84%
Bito AI82%
Supadev81%
ReadMe81%
Code Wiki81%
Swimm81%
RepoRift81%
AIGNE DocSmith81%
Compare
3 tools · best value per row highlighted
Your tool
DeepWiki-Open
DeepWiki-Open
github.com
DeepWiki-Open is an open-source wiki generator for code repositories.
Traffic estimated monthly website traffic
Monthly visits
—
1Mvisits/mo
387.9Kvisits/mo
MoM change
—
▼ 3.1%
▲ 4.0%
6-month growth
—
-30.2%
-37.3%
Global rank web
—
#39,584
#114,864
Avg. last 3 months
—
1.1M
367.8K
Bounce rate lower is better
—
35%
47%
Pages / visit
—
5.6
3.5
Visit duration
—
5m 09s
1m 51s
Traffic sources
—
● Direct 92% · ● Referral 6%
● Direct 74% · ● Referral 25%
DeepWiki-OpenReplicateMintlify
Pricing
Model
Free
Freemium
Freemium
Starting price
Free
—
$450per month · free tier available
Free tier
–
Free trial
–
–
–
API access
–
–
–
Plans
Open source (MIT) Free
Public Models Custom/usage-basedPrivate Models Custom/usage-based
Starter FreePro $450/moEnterprise Custom
Capabilities input → output
Input
CodeWeb pages
ImagesText
CodeText
Output
Documents
AudioImagesTextVideo
Documents
Skill level
Advanced
Advanced
Advanced
Categories
Tasks what each tool can do · 1 shared · core partial
Tasks covered
6
9
5
Developer tools
Code documentation
–
Development
–
APIs
–
–
Writing documentation
–
–
API integrations
–
–
Inference
–
–
Models
–
–
Repo analysis
–
–
Diagrams
–
–
Documents
–
–
GitHub
–
–
Image generation
–
–
LLM development
–
–
Self hosted
–
–
Video generation
–
–
Community on aitoolstime
Rating
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
no ratings yet
Upvotes
▲ 0
▲ 0
▲ 0
Saves
0
0
0
Reviews
0
0
0
Prompts
0
0
0
Verified listing
–
–
–
Traffic figures are third-party estimates for the tool's own domain; tools sharing a domain with a bigger product are not counted. Pricing is captured from each tool's site and may lag.