Best Grammarly Alternatives for Humanizing Text
30 AI tools that can replace Grammarly for humanizing AI text, ranked by how closely they match. The percentage is a match score, not a popularity score.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
Score set by our editors after reviewing both products; the overlap below is what they weighed.
- Offers Humanizing Text as a secondary capability42/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals9/10
- Feature description similarity13/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals2/10
- Feature description similarity3/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals2/10
- Feature description similarity8/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Offers Humanizing Text as a secondary capability42/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals9/10
- Feature description similarity9/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals3/10
- Feature description similarity5/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals2/10
- Feature description similarity5/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Offers Humanizing Text as a secondary capability42/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals3/10
- Feature description similarity12/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Offers Humanizing Text as a secondary capability42/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals9/10
- Feature description similarity12/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals5/10
- Feature description similarity10/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals5/10
- Feature description similarity12/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals5/10
- Feature description similarity9/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals3/10
- Feature description similarity13/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals3/10
- Feature description similarity12/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals2/10
- Feature description similarity8/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals2/10
- Feature description similarity4/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Built for Humanizing Text (its core category)70/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals5/10
- Feature description similarity5/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
- Offers Humanizing Text as a secondary capability42/70
- Shares Grammarly's other goals8/10
- Feature description similarity7/20
Capped below the editor-ranked picks above it.
Can it really replace Grammarly for humanizing ai text? Vote on each alternative — no account needed. Votes gently reorder the list; they never change the match score.
Missing an alternative for humanizing AI text? Suggest it
At a glance: top Grammarly alternatives for Humanizing Text
| Tool | Match | Input | Output | Pricing | Free plan | Rating | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Undetectable AI | 85% | text, images, documents | text, data | From $5/mo | No | — | AI Detector |
| StealthGPT | 82% | text | text | — | No | — | Humanizer AI |
| UndetectedGPT | 78% | text, documents | text | From $19.99/mo | Yes | — | Humanizer AI |
| Humanizer AI | 74% | text, documents | text | From $10/mo | No | — | Humanizer AI |
| GPTHumanizer | 74% | text | text | From $7.99/mo | Yes | — | Humanizer AI |
| SuperHumanizer | 72% | text | text | Free | Yes | — | Humanizer AI |
Frequently asked
What is the best Grammarly alternative for humanizing AI text?
Is there a free alternative to Grammarly for humanizing AI text?
How is the match percentage calculated?
How this list is ranked
The match score measures how much of Grammarly's job each tool can take over when the goal is humanizing AI text: shared core category, how many of the same use cases it covers, and how similar its feature set is. Popularity and ratings do not change the score; they only break ties in the order.
Lists are recomputed nightly from the live catalog and reviewed by our editors for the most-visited tools. Sponsored placements are marked and sit outside the ranking.