In my opinion, this is the best AI tool on the market for writing code right now. I’ve used many others, including ChatGPT, and for pure coding quality, this one is simply better.
That said, there are clear downsides. The token limit is very restrictive, and having to pay $5 for almost every session can add up quickly. If you’re doing serious or long-running work, the cost becomes noticeable.
Still, when it comes to output quality, logic, and how clean and complete the code is, I honestly think it’s the best option available at the moment.
Been using Opus 4.5 for like 3 weeks now and honestly? kinda blown away.
Threw it at a legacy React codebase thats been haunting me for months - class components, weird state management, the whole mess. It actually understood what I was trying to do architecturally, not just "here's how to fix this syntax error." Caught edge cases I forgot existed lol
The plan mode thing is legit. It asks questions first, makes a plan.md, then executes. Finally feels like pair programming with someone who bothers reading the ticket before coding.
Not perfect tho. Asked it some graph theory stuff for a…
PROS
code quality, plan mode, actually understands context
CONS
pricing, math/theory stuff, sometimes too cautious
I gave Claude and ChatGPT the exact same prompt for a presentation. Claude delivered something much more visually impressive. ChatGPT’s version felt flat and uninspired, almost like a basic Word file instead of a real presentation.
Claude is basically my assistant now. I use it for almost everything, even simple tasks I could probably do myself. the output is consistently great.
Claude is the best AI I’ve used, whether open-source or paid. If you can afford $200 a month, you can actually build serious projects with it and get real value out of it—whether that’s for your main job, side projects, or just handling everyday tasks more efficiently.
4.5 was good, but 4.6 is much better. I’m on the max plan and honestly it feels like a magical mystery tour, like the Beatles song 8). You more or less tell it what you want, and it gets you there.
I’ve read all reviews btw, and one thing they’re right about is CSS editing. That part can be really frustrating. You ask it to fix one small CSS bug, and somehow it breaks three other things, or changes stuff you didn’t even touch.
Most of the time it’s amazing, but when it comes to layout or tiny visual details, it can turn into this weird back-and-forth of “no, not that, undo that, just mov…
CONS
would honestly expect the CSS editing part to be much better by now
If Claude Opus 4.5 is already operating at this level, -tobehonest it is a bit scary, what's gonna happen in next 3 years? Even clueless person can create an app right now
Cookies on aitoolstime. We use necessary cookies for sign-in, theme and security. With your OK we also set first-party cookies to measure visits and tailor sponsored listings and ads to what you browse. No third-party tracking cookies.
Privacy policy
