Meeting Notes to Action Items for Claude

Paste a raw transcript or messy notes; get decisions, action items with owners and dates, open questions, and a short summary you can send to the team in one message.

by Nobodylovesyou ▲ 0 📋 0 copies 👁 0 ⭐ Featured

Fill in the variables

Prompt


            

Example input

Meeting: Weekly product sync
Attendees: Mara (PM), Deniz (engineering lead), Ola (design), Sam (support lead)
Today: 2026-10-17
Notes:
mara: ok onboarding numbers. activation 58% now, was 41 before the redesign. deniz says the magic-link bug is still there for gmail users like 3% of signups
deniz: fix is ready, needs QA, can ship tuesday
mara: tuesday is fine. ola what about the empty state
ola: new empty state mockups done, i'll share in figma today, need feedback by thursday or it slips a sprint
sam: support is getting asked about exporting data, like 8 tickets this week. do we have a plan
mara: not this quarter unless it keeps growing, lets track it. sam can you tag those tickets
sam: sure
deniz: also we should talk about moving to the new auth provider, costs are going up
mara: lets not decide that today, put it on next week's agenda, deniz can you bring numbers
deniz: yep
mara: last thing, pricing page copy, i'll have a draft friday for everyone to review

Example output generated with Claude Sonnet 4.6 from the example input above

Summary Onboarding activation has risen from 41% to 58% since the redesign, with a remaining magic-link bug affecting about 3% of Gmail signups that ships fixed on Tuesday. New empty-state designs are ready for review this week, and data export requests from support will be tracked rather than built this quarter. The auth-provider cost question moves to next week's agenda with numbers. Decisions - Agreed to ship the magic-link fix on Tuesday after QA. - Agreed not to build data export this quarter; track demand through tagged tickets instead. - Agreed to defer the auth-provider decision to next week's sync. Action items - [ ] QA and ship the magic-link fix for Gmail signups — Deniz — 2026-10-20 - [ ] Share new empty-state mockups in Figma — Ola — 2026-10-17 - [ ] Give feedback on the empty-state mockups — Mara, Deniz, Sam — 2026-10-22 - [ ] Tag incoming data-export tickets for tracking — Sam — date: not set - [ ] Bring cost numbers for the new auth provider to next sync — Deniz — 2026-10-24 - [ ] Draft the pricing page copy for review — Mara — 2026-10-23 Open questions - Whether to move to the new auth provider (raised by Deniz; decision deferred). - At what level of data-export demand the plan changes (raised by Sam, no threshold set). Needs clarification - "Feedback by Thursday" on the empty state: Ola did not name reviewers; all attendees are listed as owners above. Confirm who actually needs to respond.

Why this works & how to customize

Why it works: the prompt separates decisions from proposals and forbids guessing owners and dates, which is where most AI summaries quietly invent commitments. Resolving relative dates against today's date makes the list pasteable into a task tool. The three-sentence summary cap keeps the message readable on a phone.

How to customize: for recurring meetings, add "compare against last week's action items below and mark which were completed" and paste last week's list into the notes. For customer calls, change the headings to Summary, What they need, Objections, Next steps. In Notion AI, run this on the transcript block and the checkbox lines become real to-dos. Transcripts from recording tools work as is; you do not need to clean them first.
Open in Claude → 🍴 Fork

Comments (0)

Sign in to comment.

No comments yet.