Sider Deep Research tackles the gap between quick AI answers and proper citations. It scans 100+ websites automatically, pulls relevant information, highlights key points, and spits out structured reports with actual source links. Everything lands in Wisebase, their knowledge base system, where you can chat with saved sources later or build on previous research.
This platform runs on advanced AI models for deep analysis. Type a query in any language and it'll spend several minutes combing through sources, generating notes, and assembling a report. The side-by-side verification view lets you check claims against original sources without jumping between tabs. When you need more depth, you can refine reports on the spot.
Scholar Deep Research variant taps into 350M+ academic papers. That's solid for literature reviews or checking what's been published on narrow topics. The auto-generated notes try to broaden your thinking beyond the obvious angles, though whether they actually inspire depends on your research question.
What works: The automatic saving to Wisebase means you're building a searchable archive without extra effort. Chat functionality with saved sources beats re-reading entire PDFs when you need specific details months later. The citation structure is clean enough for actual academic work, not just vague references to "sources say." Multilingual support handles queries in languages most tools fumble.
What doesn't: Several minutes per query adds up fast when you're exploring multiple angles. One free usage isn't enough to evaluate whether it fits your workflow. You're locked into their scanning choices for those 100+ websites—no custom source lists. This system decides what's "inspiring" in its auto-notes, which might miss what you actually find interesting. Reports come back structured, but that structure might not match how you organize information.
The free trial gives you exactly one shot. That's testing, not using. You'll know if the report format works for you, but not whether it handles different research depths consistently. Pricing information isn't publicly available beyond that single free usage, so you can't plan research budgets around it.
Best fit for people who need cited reports more than quick answers. Scholars writing literature reviews. Researchers building knowledge bases over time. Anyone tired of juggling browser tabs and losing sources. It won't replace manual research for specialized topics, but it'll handle the scanning grunt work. Just don't expect instant results or unlimited free exploration.